Do you know a judge who should be arrested for blatantly violating the law? Add your nomination(s) in a comment here.
I'll get the ball rolling by nominating US District Court Judge John McBryde.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe Free
Links
Archives
Shop Amazon
34 comments:
Judge Debra Lambert, Family Court Judge over Lincoln, Pulaski, and Rockcastle counties in Kentucky.
She has an entire group picketing the courthouse and demanding she step down over abuses of power and complaints that go unanswered due to her husband being the chief justice of the Associated Office of the Courts in Kentucky!
My own experience proved the rumors I've heard about her prejudice against men; she even refused all evidence and witnesses I had in making her decisions among other one sided acts!
My experiences, these last four years trying to get "Equal Protection of the Laws" in New Jersey have been a nightmare for me and my family. The NJ SUPREME COURT's Office of Attorney Ethics is at the core of the corruption. This is the state administrative center that monitors all Attorney Ethics in New Jersey. Since all New Jersey attorneys, judges and many of its politicians come under the Office of Attorney Ethics jurisdiction, the influence that this State Agency carries is tremendous.
http://home.earthlink.net/~jack_cunningham/id2.html
I nominate the following current and former Florida State judges and Justices and US District for the Southern District of Florida and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Director for arrest for deliberate, collaborative and systematic violation of State and Federal laws and false and fraudulent imprisonment, kidnapping, assault, battery, obstruction of justice, RICO and denial of lawful access to State and Federal courts and lawful appellate processes and the laws that required I be acquitted and released from unlawful and unconstitutional imprisonment. These judicial officers are terrorists who have knowingly, intentionally and deliberately undermined the constitution of the United States and the Judicial Process:
THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Officially AND
Specific Judges: Hon. Robert B. CARNEY; Hon. Ana I. GARDINER; Hon. AND Hon. Dale ROSS, as Chief Judge, All and each of them, Individually and Officially
THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA Officially AND
Specific Judges: Hon. George SHAHOOD, Hon. Larry KLEIN, Hon. Barbara PARIENTE (as Panel),
JJs George SHAHOOD Larry KLEIN (Again) with Hon. Carole TAYLOR and Hon. Martha WARNER, as Chief Judge (Panel)
Hon. Mark E. POLEN (and as Chief Judge), Hon. Barry STONE, Hon. Steve GUNTHER, Hon. Gary FARMER, (Panel) all and each, Individually and Officially;
THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Officially and
Specific Judges: Major B. HARDING, Individually and Officially in BOTH Capacities as Chief Judge and Chairman of the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC);
FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION (JQC), officially.
Hon. William P. DIMETROULEAS, operating United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, in Broward County Florida.
I have spent over 10 years including 3 in prison for defending myself against an attacker who tried to run me off the road and kill me for over 4 1/2 miles and was prosecuted because they were protecting this repeated road raging assailant because he was an off duty police officer who bragged to police how he stalked and repeated assaulted me just to show me how it's done and then was coached to lie in trial. Every effort the bring my claims forard have been systematically and unilatterally obstructed from getting into court and every remedy to the delays and obstruction of state and federal appellate remedies have been ignored despite state const., statutes, rules of court and extensive (well established state and federal case case law (over 400 cases) that required I be acquitted as a matter of law or get a fair trial that allowed me to fully attack and defend myself in court in trial, on appeal, on postconviction process and habeas corpus for the states deliberate obstruction. Some of the case law I quoted that guaranteed me equal protection of acquittal and granting of extraordinary protective writs was definitively decided by the very judges that denied me the same protections as they deliberately obstructed my access to the courts to prevent exposure of the truth and obstruct justice being done. These judges clearly talk out of both sides of their mouths, despite their oaths and handsome paychecks to apply the law as written and decided equally to me. I have documentation to back it up so I'm not being allowed to enter a court to prove it as each subsequent court conspiratorially and systematically denied lawful access to the process, itself.
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Comm and Exec. Dir Brooke Kennerly was instrumental in blocking and sidestepping my complaint of judicial malpractice and judicial fraud upon the court, so cannot be relied upon to do its job when the stakes are forced too high by too many.
This is a reign of terror by true American TERRORISTS under color of law and cover of authority whose goal is to undermine the judicial process and democracy and our Constitutional way of life.
A state can lose its federal funding for violating the civil rights of a citizen and I would like to see this actually happen. Florida has earned and invited it.
Huck
I nominate any judge who has sentenced a drug offender to more than 15 years of incarceration at either the state or federal levels--- FREE GEORGE MARORANO 12973-004 USP Coleman FL -serving life without parole-- basically a "death sentence" for a non-violent drug offense-- put retired US 3rd cir.Judge Hannum (who then and now suffers from dementia) at the top of the list please!!
Schindler Family Calls for Judge's 'Immediate Impeachment'
By Melanie Hunter
CNSNews.com Deputy Managing Editor
March 10, 2005
(CNSNews.com) - A spokesman for the family of Terri Schindler Schiavo said Thursday the Florida judge residing over her case "ignores the state's laws and orders the premeditated killing of a disabled Florida woman by her husband."
Pamela Hennessy, media director for the Terri Schindler-Schiavo Foundation, in a press release Thursday called on disability and eldercare advocates to press for Circuit Judge George Greer's "immediate impeachment."
Full story: http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPrint.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200503\NAT20050310b.html
Do the words 'tar & feather' mean anything?
Judge Lambert that I mentioned above is now the target of a class action suit!
I pray that they take this predjudiced judge down! She recently took a man's kids from him, and he commited suicide; she is out of control and needs to answer for her crimes!
The following Supreme Court Justices are hereby nominated to the Hall of Shame for their votes to:
1. Emasculate states' rights.
2. Kill the power of the people to decide questions by use of state initiatives.
3. Improperly cite the interstate commerce clause of Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution as applicable to the medical marijuana matter.
SHAME: Antonin Scalia (62) Reagan 1986
President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat September 26, 1986.
SHAME: Anthony Kennedy (62) Reagan 1988
President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988.
SHAME: David Souter (59) Bush 1990
President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990.
SHAME: Ruth Bader Ginsburg (65) Clinton 1993
In 1971, she was instrumental in launching the Women's Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, and served as the ACLU's General Counsel from 1973-1980, and was on the National Board of Directors from 1974-1980. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. President Clinton nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat August 10, 1993.
SHAME: Stephen Breyer (60) Clinton 1994
President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994.
SHAME: John Paul Stevens (80) Ford 1975
President Ford nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat December 19, 1975.
Heard on the road by JAIL in Deadwood, South Dakota, population 1300:
"I know two judges who belong in prison and not on the bench. I am talking about judges right here in Deadwood!"
JAIL (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
www.jail4judges.org
Another judge who needs to be arrested is US District Court Judge Kent Dawson, a sorry excuse for a human being who takes up space in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Court Judge for the Middle District of Florida. His record speaks for itself.
Some of his gems:
1.) After receiving at least two affidavits of indigency for other issues, sanctioned a plaintiff a quarter-million dollars for attempting to file proposed motions via email directly to his chambers - despite the content of FRCP 5(e).
2.) Scheduled a hearing on a motion requiring the plaintiff to drive seven hours to attend - and then refused to hear arguments on that motion.
3.) Ruled on 38 motions filed by a pro-se litigant compared to only four of that litigant's represented opposition. Denied 36 of the 38, while the two granted provided no relief sought. Even denied one of the 38 that was unopposed.
There simply is not enough room here to list everything - and just from one case. The man is flat-out dangerous and needs to retire.
Judge Paul Czajka, a columbia county family court judge in new york. He has obstructed justice, he has coersed innocent people to say what he wants or he threatens you with jail time or better yet, he will terminate your parental rights. He steals money from trust accounts that he amazingly has hidden in other states so that the children or rightful parents can't dip into the funds. He instructs his stenographer to stop typing when he loses it in court with signals they had previously agreed to. How this man remains on the bench is beyond me. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the ring of lawyers that join him in his criminal activity. Law guardians padding their bills and stealing money from the county. Hmmm...what if we did that? They may make more money then I do...but I make an honest living and treat everyone with respect. I abide by the laws...when will they and who will have the power to take them down?
Look at www.crookedcolumbiacounty.com if you really want to see what's going on in Paul Czajka's courtroom!
See how to expose allegedly crooked judges, law guardians, court appointed attorneys,public defenders and CPS workers...
www.crookedcolumbiacounty.com
Make a site like this for your courtroom!
Hon Paul Czajka, Hon Gerard Maney and Hon Linda Griffin. Well too the above I am taking them all down, watch with smiles on your faces ladies and Gents. These corrupt biased racisit law breaking judges and there followers are all being brought down. I will pay them back for all of us.Legally of course. Do to my persistance and financial backing pay backs a bitch for these bastards.
These Judges should also be jailed. U.S. District Court Judges Philip Pro and Peggy Leen, 9th Circuit Court Judges Boochever, Skopil, and Leavy. Each discriminates against Pro Se Plaintiffs. But then again what do they care, these unethical Judges cowardly run and hide under the judicial immunity blanket.
What good are the Canon Rules of Judicial Conduct.
Justice for all in America, what a joke.
Haven't you all figured it out yet, when it comes to Pro Se parties, the courts run a bait & switch scam.
The courts bait a Pro Se with the term "justice for all," then switch it "justice for only those with attorneys."
If you have a complaint against a Judge, do what I did, send a complaint letter to: United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Criminal Section PHB, Washington, DC 20530.
How is that complaint filing working out for you?
When it comes to how Pro Se (self represented) litigants, the Federal Courts run a bait and switch, scam, fraud, discriminatory, and a multitude of other types of violation type of operation.
In the last nearly 4 years, I, as a Pro Se Plaintiff/Appellant/Petitioner, have been discriminated by the U. S. District Court - District of Southern Nevada (twice), 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (twice), and the U. S. Supreme Court (once). Through research, I found that this is a common violation and victimization against Pro Se litigants at the hands of corrupt, unethical, Federal Judge. Yet these bias and discriminating Judge are allowed to do this because they can cowardly hide under the Judicial Immunity blanket.
Article III Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. When Judges/Justices clearly violate the above and discriminate against an invidious class (Pro Se Litigants) is that considered good behavior. Certainly these failures of good behavior call for Impeachment of Judges in my cases, including the Chief Judges who knew about said violations and failed to act to rectify these matters.
Dr. Charles W. Heckman clearly states in his Court Task Force Report. Full report can be found at http://victimsoflaw.net/9thcircuit1.htm. There are other Task Force Reports, as well.
“Prejudices often have a greater impact on the outcome of administrative hearings and lawsuits than parties with an obligation to be impartial like to admit. Whether the prejudice is deliberate and malicious or entirely unintended, decisions colored by personal biases can be just as devastating to the victims of the resulting injustice.”
“The most common complaints by litigants of misconduct by the courts include the following: 1. Perjury is tolerated by the judge, 2. Records submitted to the court disappear from the files., 3. Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, 4. Certain litigants must always win, 5. Different standards are applied to different litigants, 6. Recent handling of civil lawsuits by the courts have instigated a white collar crime wave, 7. Court orders go unheeded, 8. Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, 9. Judges refuse to take actions required by law, 10. Courts have become inconsistent and arbitrary, 11. Federalism theory interferes with practical justice.
In both my cases: perjury committed by opposing attorneys were tolerated and permitted by the Judges, Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, and Judges refuse to take actions required by law. Said Judges and Justices also violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 8(d), 12(a)(1)(A), 55(a), 56(a), Local Rules 56-1 and 77-1(b)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 618, § 623, § 1681n, § 1681s, and § 1681s-2. All 3 of said courts have clearly shown violations of the 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, Canon Codes of Judicial Conduct 3(B)(5), 3(B)(6), 3(B)(8), as well as Civil Rights and the Preamble to the Constitution.
When I contacted all of the U. S. Senate and House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, to get legislation to eliminate Judicial Immunity, I was told by a few of their representatives, that I alone would not be able to get a meeting, however if I managed to get a celebrity to speak in front of them, then they would meet with me and the celebrity. I, actually, did contact numerous celebrities, yet to date none have responded. Why aren’t the words of a poor victim good enough for these committees?
When I contacted and went to the Las Vegas offices of the F.B.I. and U.S. Department of Justice, regarding said matter and ready to show them the nearly 700 pages of documents and proof, they blew me off.
The 2 civil lawsuits that I filed, one is against University Medical Center of Southern Nevada (UMC). The other is against Allstate Financial Services dba Allstate Adjustment Bureau (ALLSTATE) (9th. The ALLSTATE case is still awaiting the appointment of a 3 Judge Panel. It's been over a year. Both cases deal with Fair Credit Reporting Act Violations, Extortion, Fraud, Slander/Libel/Defamation of Character, etc. And if you add up the costs of filing fees, copies, postage, service fees, and other court related expenses, I am out a few thousands of dollars.
In the UMC case the U.S. District Court – District of Southern Nevada was Phillip Pro. The 9th Circuit Court 3 Judge panel consisted of Judges Edward Leavy, Otto R. Skopil Jr, and Robert Boochever. In the ALLSTATE case the U.S. District Court – District of Southern Nevada was Kent Dawson. No 3 Judge Panel has been assigned to this case yet. In fact when I filed complaints against these Judges with 9th Circuit Court Chief Judge Mary Shroeder, nothing has been done. Court Task Force Reports and studies show, Chief Judge will look the other way when Judges act unethically.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also has an unpublished policy, with regard to cases involving Pro Se litigants, and that is to delay a decision by 3 years. This court feels that a Pro Se would get tired of waiting and drop the cases. I do not plan on dropping the cases. Additionally, while criminals and those charged with crimes are given a speedy trial and appeal, Pro Se Litigants are not.
Did these Judges ever think about the impact this is going to have on all Americans, in the present and future? It now allows businesses to discriminate against whom ever they choose to. Next time you apply for a job and don’t get it because of you gender, nationality, religion, age, etc., you can thank these Judges. Next time you are told you can not eat at a certain restaurant, thank these Judges. When you get on a bus, and you are told to sit at the back of it, thank these Judges. Collection Agencies are now allowed to put false information on someone’s credit report, with no recourse against the collection agencies, so much for the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Extortion and all the other claims of action, which I listed in my lawsuits, are now legal.
I have tried many sources to find an attorney to represent me in either and both cases, however since I cannot afford an attorney, I had and am forced to represent myself. I contact the few pro bono, legal aid attorneys, yet either they are out of business, or they do not handle this type of case, or they no longer do pro bono or contingency cases.
Please, on behalf of many Pro Se litigants, help me eliminate Judicial Immunity and impeach these Judges, so that the scales of justice will again be balanced and that justice will be for all.
If these discriminatory practices are allowed to continue many more people will suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome.
I would like to nominate the following corrupt judicial minions for crimes against the people:
1. Nassau County Supreme Court Judge Peter Skelos (brother of vaccine promoting NYS Senator Dean Skelos) who recused himself from Dr. Carley's divorce case after she put the aforementioned conflict of interest on the record, but not before he transferred the custody determination of Dr. Carley's son to the family court;
2. Nassau County Family Court Judge Richard Lawrence, who ignored evidence of Joseph's abuse by his biological father and had Dr. Carley sent for a psych evaluation when she asked on the record if he was following the Constitution; who was sued by Dr Carley in Federal Court for 28 violations of her & Joseph's civil rights, yet refused to recuse himself and gave custody of Joseph to Joseph's abuser:
3. Nassau County Supreme Court Judge Anthony Falenga, who granted Dr Carley a divorce due to domestic violence (which in itself by law precluded the father from getting custody), committed a class E felony in destruction of physical evidence by ordering subpoenaed police officers NOT to show up in court, yet refused to make a custody determination based on the domestic violence against Dr. Carley;
4. NYS Administrative Judge Florence Monwe, who told Dr Carley she will never see her son again if Dr Carley does not go off TV and stop doing her work exposing vaccine induced diseases(after telling Dr Carley that her own son has insulin dependent diabetes after receiving all his vaccines);
5. Attorney General (now governor) Elliot Spitzer, who ignored a request from Nassau County Legislature attorney Sharon Commissionig (after Dr Carley appeared in front of the Nassau County Legislature and entered the proof of the corruption and fraud in the aforementioned proceedings onto the record) to investigate Dr Carley's case, but instead represented Judge Richard Lawrence (at taxpayer's expense) in Dr Carley's federal suit against Judge Richard Lawrence, getting the case dismissed because he claimed Judge Richard Lawrence is "immune, even though corrupt".
Interestingly, all of the aforementioned proof of conspiracy was not allowed into evidence in Dr Carley's NYS medical board hearings charging her with having a "delusion of conspiracy" for talking on public access television about the above corrupt individuals (thus conspiring to remove Dr Carley's medical license for revealing the corruption in the courts and in MediSIN).
Please go to www.drcarley.com for more info, and see that I have placed these same charges on my website. No charges of slander from these criminals? Of course not, because then I would have a chance to prove it is ALL TRUE...
In Service to the TRUTH, I AM,
Rebecca Carley, MD
Court Qualified Expert in Vaccine Induced Diseases and Legal Abuse Syndrome (2 of the major epidemics in America)
WAKE UP, AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On January 13, 2003, my father was reported to have died in a peaceful afternoon nap when in fact, he was murdered at the hands of an employee of the State of Florida, Department of Justice who is a Juvenile Probation Officer for Sarasota County.
In an attempt to railroad due process and deny justice, the following judges of the 12 Circuit Court of Sarasota have deliberately and knowingly participated in obstruction of justice and allowing my father's killer to evade prosecution.
Judge Andrew Owens, Deno Economou, Rick DiFuria, Judge Lee Haworth and retired, Judge Thomas Gallen, who was brought in to carry out the final moves of injustice in this case.
These criminal Judges belong in a cell next to my father's killer.
Judge Owens allowed the destruction of a 911 system which contained a crystal clear recording which captures his murder in the background.
Judge Haworth and Judge Gallen forced me to go to trial without expert witnesses being available, death scene photos which shows a foot print on my father's back, without the 911 recording in which he could be heard being murdered in the background and refused to hold an evideniary hearing to present evidence on why my fathe's body needed to be exhumed and given his first autopsy.
The Judges mentioned above are organized criminals who are putting Floridians in jeopardy.
Please review the link called hall of shame. See the evidence
www.cohenmurder.com
If he weren't deseased, I would nominate Judge Marvin U. Mounts, Jr., judge for the 15th Circuit Court in West Palm Beach, Florida. Instead, I will nominate Betty Resch.
The 15th Circuit Court has allowed the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office to file Informations (informations are a charging document, used in lieu of a grand jury indictment) based on the perjured oaths of Asst. State Attorneys.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(g) requires that prosecutors swear under penalty of perjury that they have received sworn testimony from material witnesses before filing an Information.
In reality, Palm Beach County Asst. State Attorneys routinely file Informations without ANY sworn testimony...thereby committing perjury.
Once you are arrested and in 'the system', you must prove your innocence. Literally, you are 'Guilty Before Proven Innocent'.
In 1991, I was arrested, based on Ms. Resch's sworn Information, on charges of capital sexual battery. For the next 2 1/2 years, I was held in jail and appointed a score of incompetent and ineffective public defenders.
About 18 months later, I filed a motion to dismiss the Information due to Ms. Resch's perjury. Judge Mounts denied the motion. Later that same day, I was taken down to the jail's booking room and re-booked...it seemed that the State Attorney's Office had gotten the alleged victim to swear to her previously unsworn statement.
During this period, I was illegally held in jail...kidnapped by the State Attorneys Office.
Next, my attorney claimed a discovery violation and filed a motion to allow him to see ALL documents in possession of the State Attorneys Office which related to my case.
Judge Mounts denied this motion but said he would do an 'in camera' review (which means he will examine the paperwork to see if there is ANY exculpatory evidence). Judge Mounts came back in a few minutes and said there was no exculpatory evidence. (MORE ON THIS LATER)
Finally, I got a trial. About 5 minutes into the trial, a mistrial was declared by Judge Mounts and my next trial date was scheduled for one later!
I was offered probation if I would plead to attempted sexual battery. At this point, I would've pled guilty to treason to get out of jail.
Florida requires that a reason be given by the State Attorney before the court accepts a guilty plea. When asked for this reason, the Asst. State Attorney said that I had committed 2 COMPLETED (not attempted) sexual batteries. Since there is no lesser included charges for Capital Sexual Battery, this reasoning is not legal and any sentence imposed is illegal.
My probation was violated on a technicality and i was sent to prison for the next 6 years.
When my release date arrived, instead of being released, I was told I was a 'Sexually Violent Predator' and transferred to a so-called civil committment center. For the next 51 months, I awaited a civil trial to see if I would be civilly committed as a sexually violent predator.
In 2003, I won my trial by unanimous jury verdict. I am the only man in Florida to win this type of trial unanimously. Do you have any idea how hard it is to LOSE a criminal case and then WIN an insuing civil trial? The standard of proof in a civil trial is much higher than in a criminal trial.
Florida's Rules of Civil Procedure are much different from it's Rules of Criminal Procedure. I was now allowed to view the documents that Judge Mounts had conducted the 'in camera' review on.
My alleged victim had named someone else as being her rapist!!! Sometime after being re-booked, a line had been drawn through his name and my name was printed below it. I kid you not.
Throughout my jail, prison sentence and subsequent civil detention, I maintained my innocence and told anyone who would listen about Prosecutorial perjury on Informations.
The prosecutor on my civil trial was part of the prosecutor's team in my criminal case. This man solicited perjured testimony and did everything he could to cover up the fact of Ms. Resch's perjury.
Since my release, I have twice been illigally arrested and re-imprisoned on the same case.
I was denied medical treatment and intentionally infected with Hepititus C. I was allowed to go blind in my right eye. At one point, I was locked up in a cell, the water was turned off and I was denied food for over a week.
I have since been diagnosed with PTSD due to my illegal prison sentence and subsequent civil detention. I am afraid to even go into town.
These people whould be prosecuted and imprisoned.
New Jersey Family Court in Burlington County are corrupt and on the take! Just check the Burlington County Bar Association. letter and you will see Judge Crook (Crooked) playing golf with family court attorney's! He needs to be investigated!
The Magistrate of Nassau family Court Kathleen Watson does not listen to anything, impartial ruling, ruling with no evidence, quick to make judgement without following proper court orcedure or protocol. Also aiding and abetting illegal to comein court. Not notifying the proper Law Enforcement.
Beside bias,prejudice, conflict of interest, never review or remmebr any previous court proceedings.
A amigrstrate who think she is a black robe judge.
I had a run in with that New York State Administrative Law Judge Florence Monwe back in 2002 & 03.
It involved a case against a Caseworker of the New York City Administration for Children's Services who made a threat to destroy my life after her and others in that agency protected my ex-wife who tried to murder our 11-month-old daughter. Judge Monwe protected the Caseworker and other agents by prevented me from introducing evidence and went off the records to curse at me. She then told me I cannot appeal the case. After the family case was over, my ex-wife asked many of her friends to call and ask my forgiveness. I then met with the stupid bitch and video taped her admitting to her crime. Judge Monwe, I know you will be going to HELL, but the Devil is going to lock you out for fear of you going there to over-throw him.!!! Where else do you think you'll be going?
I am dumping all the documents online for all to see, and including the transcripts from the Fair Hearing. Check out my Blog at http://www.badcitygirls.blogspot.com
www.terrorinflorida.com/cowart.aspx
Curtis "Andy" Lepel
954 943 7500
May 05, 2005 after an argument with an insane ex-girlfriend, who was destroying all of my belongings, my dog Chester (best friend) was missing
So I went "walking" the neighborhood calling for him.
I ended up at a friend's house and was standing in his yard when two BSO cars were driving down his street.
I flagged them down and asked if they had seen my dog, they replied no, and said if they seen him they would let me know.
My friend and I then got into his car,(with him driving) and drove the neighborhood looking for my dog.
When we drove by my house there were BSO cars in front of my house, so we stopped and I told the deputies that my ex-girlfriend was crazy, and that I would be back in the morning to collect my belongings and to inform her of the consequences of continuing to destroy my property.
He then told Me that anything that I didn�t remove immediately would be disposed of as she seen fit.
I had explained that I had been drinking and that I would lawfully remove my belongings in the following morning (in accordance with the Florida Landlord tenant act) but was once again told that, anything that I didn�t remove immediately, would be disposed of as she seen fit.
I contested his statements, supplied him with a copy of the Act and found myself sitting in a jail cell charged with DUI and driving with an expired driver's license, although at the time I had a valid Louisiana license, Oh and the truck that they claimed I was driving, was dismantled and taken off the road in 2000.
May 2005 After being falsely imprisoned for over two weeks, an acquaintance posted a surety bond, and I was released, only to find that every piece of property that I owned was stolen, thrown away etc...
That, on 2005, while being unlawfully detained, the petitioner was �formally� arraigned by Broward County Judge _________________________________?.
That, on or about March 19, 2005 an acquaintance of the petitioner posted an appearance bond and the petitioner was subsequently released from BSO�s custody and was informed that a notice to appear would be served via U.S. mail.
That, although the petitioner had never received any notice to appear, through his own inquiry he learned that a pre-trial hearing had been scheduled in front of County Court Judge Robert Zack � Judge Zack � http://jaablaw.com/jaablog.htm on July 08, 2005 (63 days after incident)
That, on July 08, 2005 the petitioner appeared in Judge Zack�s court, and filed an Affidavit which not only, directly attacked the State of Florida�s � State� accusations and directly challenged the In Personam jurisdiction of the court, but emphatically reserved all God Given Rights� including but not limited to his Constitutional right to a fair, speedy and impartial jury trial.
(2+ months after incident)
That, due to the fact no offer of proof substantiating the court�s lawful jurisdiction was offered or made available, and the 60 day time limit for a speedy trial upon demand had expired, the petitioner refrained from entering any plea of guilty, not guilty, no contest or otherwise, yet a not guilty plea was entered by the court.
.
That, Judge Zack further set the matter for hearing on August 25, 2005. (3 + months after incident)
That, Petitioner noticed Judge Zack and the Broward State Attorney�s Office that by August 25, 2005 time for a speedy trial would have had expired, yet all statements and submissions made by the Petitioner were ignored and dismissed.
That, on August 25,, 2005 the petitioner noticed Judge Zack of the numerous transgressions perpetuated upon him and emphasized the fact that even if the court was able to establish a valid proof of jurisdiction, his right to a speedy trial had not been recognized which, would in effect bar prosecution pursuant to F.S. 3.191, non assumpsit of jurisdiction.(3 + months after incident)
That, on October 06, 2005 the petitioner had appeared for a calendar call in Judge Zack�s court in which legal representation was refused due to insubordination. Partially due to the fact that no offer of proof of jurisdiction was made available by any claiming party nor had the court recognized that the time limitations for a speedy trial had expired and the Broward County Public Defender�s Office was not willing to demand such.(5 +months after incident)
That, on October 06, 2005 the petitioner had again emphasized to Judge Zack the fact that his right to a speedy trial had clearly been violated and that lawful discharge of the alleged offenses be ordered forthwith.(5+ months after incident)
That, although the petitioner remained emphatic, again all statements and documents were ignored by Judge Zack, whom then rescheduled future proceedings for December 15, 2005(7+ months after incident)
That under protest the petitioner had appeared in Judge Zack�s court on December 15, 2005 but was informed that he was not on Judge Zack�s docket and that He would be receiving a future notice to appear via U.S. mail.(7+ months after incident)
That, on or about January 20th 2006, the petitioner had not received any information regarding the matter and had inquired online at the Broward County Clerk�s website and found that the case was listed as �no key date or count information� .(8+ months after incident)
That, due to the above fact and the obvious fact that numerous rights of the Petitioner had been denied and or violated, combined with the absence of any sort of rebuttal, the Petitioner had reasonably assumed that the matter was lawfully disposed of. .(8+ months after incident)
That, due to the fact that an error was made by someone other than the petitioner, a capias was issued for the petitioner for not being present for a hearing that He was not only unaware of, but that he reasonably assumed had been previously discharged under law.(7-9+ months after incident)
That, on or about December 31st 2006 the petitioner had learned that there was a capias issued by Judge Gary Cowart �Judge Cowart� whom somehow unbeknownst to the petitioner had been assigned to hear the matter.(19 + months after incident)
That, immediately the petitioner personally went to Judge Cowart�s office and spoke with his Judicial Assistant �Kristine� whom stated that the matter had been assigned � all over the place� and that she �could not make heads or tails of it, and somehow the case had been assigned to Judge Cowart�s court.
(19 + months after incident)
That, the petitioner hand delivered a motion to dismiss the capias and Cristine set the matter for February 01, 2007
(21 + months after incident)
That, in order to avoid further damages the petitioner had filed a motion to dismiss the capias to be filed, in which, the motion was set hearing on February 01, 2007.( 21 + months after incident)
That, under protest, but in fear of further damages, the Petitioner had appeared in front of Judge Cowart whom had dismissed the capias that was previously issued, but also refused to hear about any of the previous incidences leading up to the present situation.(5 + months after incident)
That, the Petitioner believes that the numerous points and authorities made herein, combined with the evidence substantially shows that Judge Cowart acted unlawfully by stating that the matter was being placed in Status Quo Ante and that this was a �new arraignment� and further set the matter for a hearing on March 09, 2007. (24 + months after incident)
That, on March 09, 2007 the petitioner had attempted to place Judge Cowart on judicial notice of the law and facts surrounding the matter, but Judge Cowart stated that he was refusing judicial notice and that anything that the petitioner had to state would be heard at trial and once again set the matter for hearing on April 20th 2007.(25 + months after incident)
That, due to Judge Cowart�s obvious usurpations, and refusal to recognize the Petitioner�s rights procedural or otherwise, and all other statements, the petitioner had reasonably foreseen that a seemingly unlawful trial was eminent. .(24 + months after incident
That, the Petitioner had attempted to acquire witnesses in his favor but was unsuccessful, due to the extensive time that had lapsed, which was from no fault of his own and Judge Cowart had further set the matter for hearing on May 24th 2007 (24 + months after incident)
That, being that due to the fact that Judge Robert Zack and Judge Gary Cowart have on numerous occasions failed to observe the declarations of common law rights that have been asserted, the petitioner has presumed that the court is not operating under a common law jurisdiction and had filed numerous jurisdictional inquiries, to which as of present no party of interest have challenged. (31 + months after incident)
That, on May 24th 2007 the petitioner had submitted a �Judicial Notice of Improper Jurisdiction�, �Motion for Judgment of Acquittal� and �motion for d6 clearance� which outlined along with numerous points of law the specific requirements necessary for a proper common law proceeding, to which as of present no affidavit of rebuttal substantially countering the document has been made available to the petitioner.
(24 + months after incident)
That, Judge Cowart�s assistant �Kristine� had set the matter for hearing, on July 31, 2007.
That, on July 31st 2007 the petitioner had transportation issues and arrived for the hearing 26 minutes late and was informed by Cristine that a capias had been issued because he was late and Judge Cowart informed her to advise me to file a motion to dismiss the capias. (26 + months after incident)
That, on or about August 03, 2007 the petitioner had hand delivered a motion to dismiss the capias and the matter was set for hearing on August 20, 2007.
(27 + months after incident)
That, on August 20, 2007 the petitioner appeared in Judge Zack�s court, whom stated that they could not find my file with the previous motions to be heard and set the matter for recall.(27 + months after incident)
That after some time Judge Zack recalled the matter and stated that they were still unavailable to find the file, he would go ahead and grant the motion to dismiss the capias, but that the petitioner was lucky that it was being dismissed and that next time he would not be so tolerant and set the matter for hearing on September 27, 2007 (28 + months after incident)
That, on September 27th 2007 the Petitioner arrived in expectation that stated motions were going to be heard, but was informed by Judge Cowart that he was not hearing to the motions and that the Petitioner should have known that �Mondays are calendar calls� and that he �Does not listen to motions on Mondays� and further reset the matter �Motions� to be heard, on October 31st 2007.(29+months after incident)
That, on October 31st 2007, the Petitioner arrived, but found that Judge Cowart was only allowing certain portions of the motion to be heard, and asked the Assistant State Attorney if she had any objections, to which she had replied that the motion was not timely filed, to which Judge Cowart denied the motions presumably in that, the motion contained the word �acquittal� not �dismissal. (29+months after incident)
That, as of present, the Petitioner argues that he has on numerous occasions filed several affidavits and motions to dismiss throughout the course of the matter, and that all efforts have been in vein in that, they were never recognized or heard.(31+months after incident)
That, the Petitioner notified all known parties of interest, including but not limited to Judge Cowart, that he has never waived his right to a Speedy Trial or any other right, other than his right to representation, but to the contrary has redundantly emphasized and made formal reservation of the any and all Rights, throughout every stage of this matter. .(31+months after incident)
That, as of present, the Petitioner has on numerous occasions verbally notified Judge Cowart that this incident occurred nearly three years ago and that, by no fault or action of the Petitioner was this matter delayed, other than the 26 minutes that he was late on July 21st 2007.(26 + Months After Incident)
That the Petitioner has notified Judge Cowart that he had filed several motions and affidavits that, whether redundant and unorthodox or not, well established and noticed all parties of the fact that the window for a speedy trial had expired over two years ago, but that instead of being heard the matter was transferred from one bench to another.
That, on numerous occasions, the petitioner has notified Judge Cowart of the fact that on or about December 31st 2006 he had learned that a capias had been issued for his arrest and had, spent numerous hours in the courthouse in an attempt to discover which Judge had been assigned to hear the matter .
That, on November 16th 2007, the Petitioner informed Judge Cowart that it was not until, on or about December 31st 2006 the Petitioner had finally learned that the case had been assigned to Judge Cowart, which led to the series of events stated above. .(30 + Months After Incident)
That, November 16th 2007, Judge Cowart finally inquired of the Clerk as to how the case was mishandled, to which she replied that originally Judge Zack recused himself, the matter was transferred to a Judge Robinson (I believe), whom also recused herself and then was subsequently assigned to Judge Cowart.
.(30 + Months After Incident)
That, during the hearing on November 16th 2007, the Petitioner once again informed Judge Cowart that he believed that substantially sufficient grounds for a lawful dismissal of the matter were contained the previously submitted documents, that he would rely on his those submissions.(30 + Months After Incident)
That, as of present and on every occasion Judge Cowart has dismissed all statements and submissions �at this time� and further ordered the Petitioner to undergo a psychological evaluation and reset the matter for hearing on November 16th 2007 (30+ Months after Incident)
That, On January 31, 2008 the court held an "Evidentiary Hearing" in which Dr. Block-Garfield testified that Petitioner appeared to be "An intelligent and articulate Young Man," that the Petitioner understood the nature of charges, the roles of the Judge, Jury, Prosecution and Defense Attorney and was able to accurately state the series of events leading his arrest.
That, at the hearing Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon testified that the Petitioner understood the nature of charges, the roles of the Judge, Jury, Prosecution and Defense Attorney and was able to accurately state the series of events leading his arrest. but was incompetent to proceed because his legal arguments and beliefs were a product of an "entrenched delusion" belief.
That, the Petitioner inquired into Dr Fiedman And Dr. Brannon's legal training and education, to which both testified that they had no formal legal educaton and were not proficient in the letter of the law, but stated that due to the fact the petitioner kept stating that he was a sovereign and had rights, petitioner's held an invalid and delusional legal belief.
That, the Petioner contends that, based on their own sworn testimony,Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon are not legal professionals educated in the legal system and have absolutely no authority to "Judge" the validity of the Petioner's legal arguments and that although the court's have held that physicians can be held to be acting "under the color of law" they in no manner have authority to "judge" the law.
That, Based on the preceding fact(s) it is reasonable to assume that Judge Gary Cowart based his ruling on the "legal advice" of Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon, although they testified under oath, that they were not legal professionals.
That, it would be reasonable to Assume that Judge Cowart , Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon hold delusional legal beliefs in that, the Judge is to Judge the law and not the "Witness"
That, Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon both testified under oath, that the "Petitioner" that the Petitioner understood the nature of charges, the roles of the Judge, Jury, Prosecution and Defense Attorney and Himself and was able to accurately state the series of events leading his arrest and was not a threat to himself or others.
That, Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon both testified under oath that, they held no formal legal training and were not qualifies legal professionals.
That, Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon both testified under oath that, the Petitioner's legal arguments and rights were an invalid and " entrenched delusional" belief which could probably be cured by psychotropic medication.
"Government Forced Chemical Mind Control" for those crazy few who are still demand Rights
That, it would be reasonable to Assume that based on Dr. Friedman and Dr. Brannon's testimony Judge Cowart Jumped at the Opportunity to find Petitioner incompeteant to proceed, possibly because of ????
That, Dr. Friedman nor Dr. Brannon, hold any authority to judge the law and or to decide wether or not the Petitioner is a Sovereign, what rights Petitioner has, or whether or not petitioner's arguments are valid.
Who's Delusional Now ?
That, although the Petitioner has notified all parties of interest, on numerous occasions, that the charge of driving with license expired is frivolous in that the Petitioner has had a valid driver�s license, issued from another state since 2003.
That, at the time of the incident, the Petitioner was not bound by any agreement or consent with the State of Florida to submit to any sobriety tests.
That, the Petitioner was not in control of any motor vehicle at the time of the incident, but to the contrary was the passenger of the vehicle, therefore not obligating him to perform any sort of sobriety testing.
That, as proof of this, the vehicle that was listed in the incident report, 1973 Ford f-350, VIN # ____________, Florida license plate # VAB 436, was dismantled, sold for salvage and not been in existence since October of 2000, therefore substantiating that all statements and accusations made by Broward Sheriff�s Office are utterly false, misleading, malicious and frivolous. (4+years prior to incident)
That, although he did so under protest, the petitioner has always made himself available for all proceedings in this matter and by or through no direct action of the petitioner, has any of the proceedings been delayed.
That, due in part to the fact that such an extensive time period has passed, the petitioner sincerely believes that he would be prejudiced and does not reasonably foresee any logical way to receive a fair and speedy trial.
That, the petitioner is able to factually prove that as a direct result of this series of transgressions the petitioner has and continues to suffer intense personal damages and financial losses well in excess of three hundred thousand dollars
(to date).
Therefore due to the probability of a future civil action(s), with damages well in excess of $ 15, 000.00, the petitioner herein wishes to reserves this court�s jurisdiction in the seemingly likely event that further civil action is sought
That, the petitioner has endured nearly three years of financial and personal hardships due to the obvious malfeasance of justice and believes that any future actions, by all herein stated parties, concerning this matter, would certainly result in further irreparable damages.
That, the fact that Judge Cowart refused to acknowledge the Petitioner�s statements and �formally arraigned� the Petitioner more than twenty one months preceding the incident clearly illustrates that Judge Cowart has and continues to act beyond the scope and bounds of his authority.
That, the Petitioner believes that Judge Cowart�s latest order for Petitioner�s psychological evaluation is nothing more than an attempt to distort the facts, his acts, omissions and events that have transpired throughout the course of this matter. (31+Months After Incident)
That, due to the fact that Judge Cowart refuses to observe the Petitioner�s rights, the declarations thereof and the State of Florida refuses to file a Nolo Prosequ , the Petitioner rightfully and reasonably believes that Judge Cowart either holds a biased and prejudicial opinion of the Petitioner or his court is not of a constitutional nature, by allowing the Broward County State Attorney�s Office to unlawfully proceed against the Petitioner in contradiction with and disregard to numerous Constitutional Rights and statutory provisions.Thus in either situation would place Judge Cowart beyond the scope of his lawful authority
Further Violating his Performance Bond
Below is a copy of the bond that I found at the Dept. of State's Website,
State of Florida Secretary of State
Division of Elections
500 South Bronough Street, Room 316
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
Public Official Bond
County of
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we,
(Official�s Name)
as Principal, and as Surety, are bound unto the Governor of the State of Florida, and his successors in office, in the
sum of $ Dollars, we hereby bind ourselves and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, whereas, said official
was elected appointed to hold this office
(Name of Office)
for a term beginning and ending and until
his/her successor is qualified according to the Constitution and Laws of the State of Florida.
NOW, THEREFORE, If the official shall faithfully perform the duties of his/her office
as provided by law, this obligation is void.
X
(Signature of Official)
Signed and Sealed this day of , 20 .
(Address of Main Surety Company)
(Name of Local Bonding Company)
(Address of Local Bonding Company)
(SEAL) By X
(Signature of Florida Licensed Agent)
(Social Security Number of Florida Licensed Agent)
(Type Name of Florida License Agent)
The above is approved this day of , 20 .
Signature:
Approved by:
1bond.doc (2/04))
Jed S Rakoff, US District Judge should be arrested for falsifying trial minutes to make himself look good.
I nominate U.S. District Judge Jed S Rakoff from the Southern District of New York as best yet arrest candidate.
One would think that federal judges are beyond reproach. That is not the case with Federal Judge Jed S Rakoff, a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York appointed to the bench since January 4, 1996. Rakoff graduated with honors in English literature from Swarthmore College (B.A. 1964), earned his M. Phil. from Balliol College at Oxford University (1966), and graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School (J.D. 1969). He has received honorary degrees from Saint Francis University and from Swarthmore. He is, by all definitions, an erudite.
Yet, in the recent case of United States v. Marco Castellar (03) Cr 891 (JSR) S.D.N.Y he seems to have gone crazy, and violated his oath of office when he ignored Castellar's claims that the Internal Revenue Service had falsified the official transcript of certain exculpatory Brady material, which consists of the criminal falsification of the translation of a videotape of a failed undercover operation that totally exculpates Mr. Castellar. Unfairly, the government used this falsified translation against Castellar during trial which greatly contributed to Castellar's conviction on certain counts. A frustrated Mr. Castellar indicated to Judge Rakoff---who refused to inquiry into the matter to protect the goverment's interest and that of his long time Ex-Colleague at the U.S. Attorney's Office at the S.D.N.Y, Federal Prosecutor Peter B Sobol,---that he "had let the government get away with murder."
Mr. Castellar subsequently contacted the FBI who does not really want to get involved because it involves a federal judge and federal prosecutors. Castellar indicated to the FBI that no one is above the law.
To complicate matters even more, Judge Rakoff altered the minutes of the various proceedings, and the hand written alterations can be seen on the original transcripts. He shows himself defiant and indicates that the alterations are proper. What can be done about judges who think they are above the law?
In Thurston County, Washington JUDGE Daniel Berschauer denied me a jury trial in a criminal case I was charged 175 counts for excavation on my own private property with a permit from the State DNR. That was in 1979 He is still there.
Could someone please help me!! I live in a small town where it is still all in who you know, I cant seem to get any help with a stalker(female) because her dad is a retired judge in our town, really i pray she could get medical attention for her problems but i cant get help with her because of who her dad is, i have never looked at this lady would not know if i were talking to her, dont know her phone numbers, yet she gets away with calling people telling them off and all the while she has my phone nymber show up on others phones where they think it is me, there again a small town because it cant be found out how she is doing that. so please where can i get some help??? I live in Blackshear Georgia, so please any information would be great. Not sure how much mental help she needs, but if you hear on the news about someone missing in this town please let somone know i tried to get help but not in a SMALL TOWN!
email is barmaid69d@yahoo.com
It's time for term limits for all
Judges. The Judical system has no accountability and is irresponsible. This is not just a problem on Long Island. But is a major problem in Pennsylvania and across the nation. Case in point Family Court. Gender biased with no regard for the US Constitution.Or economic reality.
Debtor's prison is utilized on a regular basis mostly on poor people. Earning capacity (legal fraud-toxic assets) is applied on
as matter of fact. Even in economic depression as today. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U6,
unemployment at 16.4%. Seldom used by the media. Family Court has put poor adults on trial for the economic crisis. Unemployment.
if there is one rotton judge allowed to operate then the reality is they are all rotten. If this were not so the other judges would not tolerate such rotteness for one day. Until people understand that they are all rotten, we will make no progress. The reason you are not allowed to get files from the courts (in australia anyway) is taht the release of such under proer scrutiny would result in mass uproar with the peole storming the police and the courts and draginng the scum out of their holes.
I feel a strong need to report Kathleen Watson, magistrate of Nassau County Family Court, NY. She definitely does not listen and does make impartial rulings. She does this because she just wants to get the paperwork off her desk since she is so god damn "lazy." That is why everyone dislikes her so much. She obviously hates her job. If you believe in karma, then what does around comes around!
North Carolina Brunswick County Superior Court Judge Ola Lewis. After recussig herself from a case in Brunswick County she still felt the need to involve herself in making sure this defendant would not be heard when filing his motion for relief. Wonder why? try this on for size. The defendant pleaded guilty to a lesser charge "Only" because the one thing that would prove his innosence was denied to him. After he was convicted he had to fight to get his own case file from his so called attorney. After recieving his file he discovered evidence in his case that if given to him before he would not be sitting in prison today. This Judge knew this and even though she recused herself she still buted in by denieing his motion for relief and barred him from filing in the future. I believe she did this to make sure that evidence would never pass through the right hands because if it did Mr Stidham would be a free man. Check out the case. Luther Daniel Stidham. He was was a police officer in Brunswick NC. A 14 yr old female BNL claimed they had sexual intecourse. It did'nt matter that this same female had accused at least 4 others including her own brother and father. They said the sexual releationship between her and Mr Stidham came to light when she attempted suicide being depressed over the relationship. They failed to tell everyone that this so called attempt to kill herself consisted of 8Tylenols, the rest were found in the toilet, this was a statement fro her own father who also said he believed she was only seeking his attention. 4 interviews were conducted by the prosocution but not one was used in court, why? because every witness they called would have been more help to Mr Stidham then to the "alleged" victim. There were also 2 witnesses that stated they believe they were with Mr Stidham on the night in question. They were not used for the same reason. Also, there was a DNA test that the state ordered looking for semin, they did not find any. All this and more was hidden from Mr Stidham, he only found all this after recieving his case file. I did forget to mention that at the same time this was going on another male was accused of te same but was given onl 30days even after finding clear evidence that the sexual relationship did in fact happen. If Judge Lewis was any kind of REAL judge she wold allow Mr Stidham his true day in court, but instead she Barrs him so the truth can't get out.
Post a Comment